Kieler Militia Supply is here to educate the masses on their rights and help shed light on firearms. We are here to support the "Unorganized Militia" and "Organized Militia". --“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788


Thursday, January 16, 2020




Laws governing recall in Virginia

Recall news
Recalls by state
Recalls by year
Recalls by type

Recall of elected officials in Virginia is made available through Virginia statutes. Unlike other states that hold recall elections however, when citizens have petitioned for a recall, it is then sent to the state Circuit Courts for trial.
Virginia is one of two states that provide for recall only through state statutes and not constitutional law, the other being Montana.[1]

Who may be recalled?

Code § 24.2-233 states that "Upon petition, a circuit court may remove from office any elected officer or officer who has been appointed to fill an elective office, residing within the jurisdiction of the court."[2]
The Virginia Law Review in 1975, the year the recall statutes were enacted, noted of the law, "A single Code article now governs the removal of state and local officers, both elected and appointed, except those whose removal from office is specifically provided for in the Virginia Constitution." The statute can be interpreted to generally mean all locally elected officials can be recalled. However, given ambiguity in the statute language, particularly in regard to court jurisdiction, it is unclear as to what extent the recall process would apply to state officers. There is no precedent of a Virginia state legislator or governor having faced recall, nor has the process been litigated in the courts. Removal of the Virginia Governor by impeachment is provided for in the Virginia Constitution.[1][3]
Can you recall a federal official?
The U.S. Constitution does not provide for recall of any federally elected official. Although some state constitutions have stated that their citizens have the right to recall members of the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court has not ruled on whether this is constitutional at the federal level.
Read Ballotpedia's explanation »

Recall reasons

Code § 24.2-233 states acceptable reasons for recall when it has "material adverse effect upon the conduct of the office" include:[2]
  • Neglect of duty
  • Misuse of office
  • Incompetence in the performance
Other acceptable reasons include:
  • Conviction of a misdemeanor relating to drugs
  • Conviction of a misdemeanor involving a "hate crime"

Petition requirements

The petition for recall must be signed by at least 10% of the number of people who voted in the last election for the office being recalled.[2] The petition must also detail the reasons for removal.[4]
Further applicable petition requirement for local recall efforts may be found in § 24.2-684.1. Potential petitioner should check with their local authorities for the most current and applicable regulations.

Trial process

After the petition has been submitted:
  • The officer subject to recall will receive notice.[4]
  • The officer's position may be suspended.[5]
  • The attorney for the Commonwealth will represent the state.[6]
  • The official subject to a recall trial has the right to demand a trial by jury.[6]
  • The results of the trial may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia.[6]

Filling vacancies

If an official is recalled, the general procedure is to follow the laws set out for filling vacancies under Virginia Code Title 24.2 - Elections. For instance, when Mayor James Holley of Portsmouth was recalled for the second time in 2010, it was the city council who was charge with appointing a temporary successor; if they had failed to do it the process would have been deferred to the courts.[7][8]

See also

External links


Friday, January 3, 2020

Colorado leftwing extremists passed Red Flag law

Another Leftist trying to attack Gun Rights in Georgia

Another Leftist trying to attack Gun Rights in Georgia

LaVoy Finicum's Murder and the current injustice that could happen to you

LaVoy Finicum's Murder and the current injustice that could happen to you.
What occurred!

Keep in mind he has no warrants and has not been charged formally with any crimes. They do specify with reason for stop and they do not notify of road block ahead.   

An FBI agent has been indicted on federal accusations that he lied about firing at Robert "LaVoy" Finicum last year as police arrested the leaders of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupation.

The agent will face allegations of making a false statement with intent to obstruct justice, according to sources familiar with the case.

Video Footage from in the truck day of murder.

Daughter's comments and ongoing fight.

You can support the family at their website:

Full press conference on LaVoy Finicum's death investigation

In my opinion the Oregon Law Enforcement's assessment is shit. They could have just allowed him to go to the Sheriff and follow as suggested and had no fatalities. They did not state reason for pullover! He didn't draw a firearm and was shot in the back.  This is really sad and unfortunate. The court system buried the investigation into wrong doings. 

Follow up from the incident:

The lawsuit was filed in January 2018 in U.S. District Court of Oregon by Ryan Payne, Shawna Cox and others who were associated with the Bundy family’s 2016 occupation of the wildlife refuge. They claimed that FBI agents, Oregon State Police and other officials violated their civil rights by using excessive force and “ambushing” them on the day Finicum was shot and killed.

Chief District Court Judge Michael Mosman dismissed all counts in the lawsuit Friday, saying “It’s time to put a fork in this case.”

Last year a jury declared an FBI agent not guilty of obstructing an investigation into who fired two errant shots at Finicum. Agent W. Joseph Astarita, 41, was charged with making false statements and obstruction of justice after telling investigators he did not fire the shots that missed Finicum.

Many of the original defendants in the case, including Astarita and Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, had already been dismissed over the course of nearly two years of litigation.

ASK yourself why would they lie about the shots fired???? Ask Yourself this, Does a statement from the Judge "It's time to put a fork in this case." sound unbiased to you?

Do you think it was justified? 
LaVoy Finicum was legally carrying the firearm and was not a convicted felon.
Let me say, if I took those shots as a concealed carry holder it would not be a justified shooting someone in the back and I would be in jail as a private citizen. 

Other observations that were found interesting:

First shot was earlier on. True intents??? Escalate and Kill??

Other accounts and Excellent External Analysis that shows a ton of problems. Evidence points to methodically planned hit.