For the Unorganized Militia in Preparation of Response Force

 For the Unorganized Militia in Preparation for the Creation of a Response Force. 

Fuck around and Find out! Know your Camo. Guerilla Warfare will be the name of the game awaiting foreign threats.

This May Be The Assault Weapons Ban Case The Supreme Court Is Waiting For

 This May Be The Assault Weapons Ban Case The Supreme Court Is Waiting For

 

The Deadly FUNGUS Chinese "Scholars" Have Snuck into the MIDWEST

This video contains details on how serious of a threat this was.

Something that isn't being discussed is the Geoengineering in the Midwest that is creating ideal conditions for the fungus to take hold and infect our food supply. The current conditions in the Midwest are exactly what is needed to have a successful attack take place. 

Every week, I observe geoengineering activities aimed at creating cloud formations and inducing rain. This is exactly the kind of thing we need to make laws against. If it's not sprayed directly, it's being added to jet fuel to create weather formations and darken the skies. 

If you don't know what I am talking about review this

 (SAI) is a proposed method of solar geoengineering aimed at reducing global warming by introducing aerosols into the stratosphere to create a cooling effect. Researchers have explored the idea of using commercial jets to release aerosols over the poles, offering a quicker and lower-cost strategy compared to designing specialized high-altitude aircraft.

One specific proposal involves using commercial passenger aircraft to inject sulfur compounds emitted by aviation fuel into the stratosphere, mimicking the cooling effect of volcanic eruptions.

Recent research indicates that adding particles 13 kilometers above the polar regions could meaningfully cool the planet, though it would be less effective than at higher altitudes closer to the equator. Commercial jets like the Boeing 777F could potentially reach this altitude, making it feasible to implement this strategy using existing aircraft.

Additionally, there are concerns about the unintended consequences of aerosol injection, including impacts on precipitation, local cold temperature extremes, and the hydrological cycle. Despite these risks, some argue that the ease of deploying this particular intervention could lead to quicker implementation, raising ethical and regulatory issues.

• Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI): Proposed method to reduce global warming by injecting aerosols into the stratosphere using commercial jets.

• Commercial Jets: Used to release aerosols over the poles for a quicker and lower-cost geoengineering strategy.

• Sulfur Compounds: Injected into the stratosphere via aviation fuel to mimic volcanic cooling effects.

• Altitude Considerations: Effective cooling at 13 kilometers above polar regions, achievable with existing aircraft like the Boeing 777F.

• Unintended Consequences: Potential impacts on precipitation, temperature, and the hydrological cycle.

Sources of Information discussing topic: 

https://climateviewer.com/2014/11/05/contrails-geoengineering-nato-single-fuel-concept/

https://www.preventionweb.net/news/geoengineering-technique-could-cool-planet-using-existing-aircraft

https://scitechdaily.com/geoengineering-goes-polar-a-faster-riskier-way-to-cool-the-earth/ 

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/document-revealing-the-contents-of-jet-a-1-fuel/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/01/1069283/researchers-launched-a-solar-geoengineering-test-flight-in-the-uk-last-fall/

https://geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-jets/

https://phys.org/news/2025-04-geoengineering-technique-cool-planet-aircraft.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/geoengineering-treatment-stratospheric-aerosol-injection-climate-change-study-today-2018-11-23/

https://weathermodificationhistory.com/geoengineering-with-sulfur-jet-fuel-commercial-aviation/

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/airplane-contrails-may-be-creating-accidental-geoengineering-180957561/ <-- I don't believe for a second any of this is accidental. 

Call your politicians and demand a Ban on Geoengineering and fuel additives used for geoengineering.

BOOM! This Case Takes The NFA To The Supreme Court!

 BOOM! This Case Takes The NFA To The Supreme Court!

Democrat Insurrection. Kidnapping of Federal Agents by Restaurant Owner

🚨BREAKING: Business Owner Just KIDNAPPED ICE Agents - The FBI Response Will TERRIFY You

Major Legal Challenge To Machinegun Ban! Destroy The NFA NOW!

 Major Legal Challenge To Machinegun Ban! Destroy The NFA NOW!

Call your politicians. Keep fighting the anti-gun nutjobs.

This argument is from the Machingun Guy below.  I think the title should be changed to "the argument to be unrestricted", because it's legal to own pre-ban machine guns. It needs to be made legal again to produce yourself at home if you have the skills. Unrestricted. We need to have all our rights as it was before the Al Capone days. It was unconstitutional then as it is now to be restricted in any way, shape, or form. I would also like to note that Gatling guns are still unrestricted and 100% legal to buy without special tax stamps. No one from the government has explained to me how a tax stamp makes the firearm any safer. I'm still confused and baffled by that, because it doesn't, and it's all completely unconstitutional. 

Source for below: https://machinegunguy.com/arguments-for-citizens-to-legally-own-machineguns/

Some edits were made to correct grammatical errors. 

Arguments for citizens to legally own machine guns.

During WWII, there were a couple of interesting facts concerning the decisions made by the AXIS powers.  Do you know which European country was not invaded/conquered by the Nazis?  How about why the Japanese never invaded the continental United States?

The answer to the Japanese question was because Admiral Yamamoto said that “behind every blade of grass (in America) was a rifle”.  The answer to the Nazi question?  Switzerland, for essentially the same reason.

Switzerland has had mandatory military service since WWI or before, but with one notable exception when compared to our military discharge policy……every Swiss serviceman/woman takes their military firearm back home.  That means not only is everyone in that country armed, but nowadays they return home with fully automatic weapons.  More than likely, every household in Switzerland has access to a live machine gun.  Have there been any problems with the Swiss and their proliferation of firearms?  I wasn’t aware of them invading anyone or starting border skirmishes.

Nazi generals knew they might be able to get their tank/armored/assault divisions in-country on those thin hairpin mountain roads, but when it came to their support infantry or even re-supply; they would in turn be fired on by every 10yr old to great grandparent marksmen/women from elevated (and camouflaged) positions. 

I could see that sudden mortality rate skyrocketing as being kind of disheartening for the Nazi troop morale, regardless of their Pervitin use:

https://www.history.com/articles/inside-the-drug-use-that-fueled-nazi-germany

Those same generals came up with a great idea, let’s just sign a treaty and go around.

I wonder if China, Russia, drug cartels, terrorists, traffickers, gang-bangers, Globalists, and/or the UN would think the same way.  Instead of our adversaries always having the advantage, the playing field would be leveled.  Have you ever heard of serial killers and/or mass shootings in Switzerland?  Has any other country even messed with Switzerland?  I haven’t noticed anything; could there be some correlation here?  Look at Swiss immigration policies as well.  They are a pretty closed society and I haven’t heard of any street-gang issues there.

When our founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment, we were still receiving military aid from the French (rifles included), and there were NO differences between styles of operation/function of the French firearms and those used by the British.  If machineguns were available back then, the French would have made certain we got those as well because at the time they were also supplying us with artillery, which Francis Scott Key noticed before penning his “one-hit-wonder” in 1814.

The real basis of the 2nd amendment is for the government to respect its citizens, not bully them.  The history of gun control internet link is below:

https://www.spartanfirearmstraininggroup.com/a-brief-history-of-gun-control-a-disarmed-population-is-easier-to-oppress-than-an-armed-one/#:~:text=Soviet%20citizens%20were%20allowed%20to,that%20firearm%20ownership%20was%20outlawed

The above article is a good reference of what happened in which year around the world, along with their inevitable follow-on genocides, so always remember those results of the human losses when considering those “control” policies. 

When the bullying gets really egregious around here, you end up having to send D.O.G.E. to the rescue to cut off funds for frivolous/delaying lawsuits by activist attorneys, judges, and Soros & Son funded NGO’s and their minions.

Another Swiss item of interest….suppressors.  Over there, they are treated and sold like any basic firearm accessory (sling, scope, magazine, etc.).  With the entire Swiss population who enjoys shooting as a sport, you are considered rude by your neighbors if you don’t use one, especially with those echoes rolling all through those Alps.  You also don’t have to worry about those muzzle reports creating any avalanches pushing your home, cars, and everything else down some slope.

As most firearms owners know, suppressors are not ‘silencers’, all while Hollywood exaggerates their effectiveness in James Bond films.  Movies tend to persuade society (either intentionally or accidentally), and they depict silencers as being a part of assassin-only weapons, when in reality, no one likes to wear hearing protection, which then messes up their hairdos/wigs/hairpieces.

Here is what I am referring to specifically regarding changes:

The National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 imposes an excise tax on the manufacture and transfer of Title 2 firearms (machineguns, suppressors, short-barrel rifles (SBR’s) and mandates the registration of those firearms.

Modify the NFA with the repeal of the following (2) acts, as well as remove from the NFA act the regulations/registrations/taxes on both short-barrel rifles as well as suppressors.

 1. The Gun Control Act of 1986 banned the Importation of NFA firearms

 2.  Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 / Hughes Amendment, which prohibits individuals from acquiring a machinegun that was US manufactured after 1986

The Courts have recently held that the NFA provision (criminalizing possession of certain firearms-including machine guns) was not in violation of the Second Amendment’s restriction, and therefore WAS CONSTITUTIONAL from United States vs. Morgan. <-- They got it wrong on purpose. Corrupt judges at the time. 

The Supreme Court also ruled against pistol braces being classified as buttstocks with regard to short-barrel rifles.  We all know how those braces are really used; they are really used as buttstocks. 

The Supreme Court also just recently allowed Forced Reset Triggers FRT’s (which are unregistered and run as fast as full auto) back into regular domestic sales for both the AR-15 as well as the AK-47.  Check out the video below (especially its final comparison segment).

FRTs exist because America called and they want their Machine Gun back. That's the bottom line. It was unconstitutional to restrict it, and it's time to lift all bans and restrictions. That's the bottom line.

The Big Beautiful Bill PORK ALERT and A War Is Starting!!

The Big Beautiful Bill PORK ALERT. More Traitors to be rooted out of our government. 

A War Is Starting!!