NEW VIDEO PROVES Woman STRUCK ICE Agent, Activist Says COME AT US | Timcast IRL
FAFO Justified Shooting
Warning: This contains unedited video of someone being shot.
Prosecute the Survivor (Wife) for being an accomplice in federal crimes.
RETAKE ON Attempted murder by vehicle
Colion Noir, a Lawyer's perspective and technical analysis.
The photo Mainstream won't show you
Renee Nicole Good
Another whackjob in my opinion. They pin her up as some innocent woman, but if you scour the internet for her social media, you'll find all kinds of problems with this woman. Sorry, she f'd around and found out. She put herself in this situation, acted as a criminal, and got dealt with as such. You refused to comply, and you almost killed an officer while using a vehicle that should never have been there to begin with. This was not a peaceful protest, and it was a deliberate criminal act. Multiple felonies committed.
Hopefully, the motherless child ends up with another member of the family, because the spouse in this case should be charged criminally as an accessory. I will say it's not easy for a man to gain full custody of one's children over the other parent, and for the ex-husband to get custody of the first two, usually, there are deeper issues at play. These people are brainwashed and mentally twisted, in my opinion.
Prior To the Shooting. Saying F ICE
Attempted Murder, Talking Smack the whole time to Federal Agents.
Unedited Officer's Cell Video at Link.
Sorry, but we are on the side of law enforcement on this one. 100% self-defence by the officer.
Does This Change Your Perspective About the Minnesota ICE Shooting at All?
Applicable Minnesota Law.
609.06 AUTHORIZED USE OF FORCE.
§Subdivision 1.When authorized. Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions 2 to 4, reasonable force may be used upon or toward the person of another without the other's consent when the following circumstances exist or the actor reasonably believes them to exist:
(1) when used by a public officer or one assisting a public officer under the public officer's direction:
(i) in effecting a lawful arrest; or
(ii) in the execution of legal process; or
(iii) in enforcing an order of the court; or
(iv) in executing any other duty imposed upon the public officer by law;
609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE.
The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.
609.066 AUTHORIZED USE OF DEADLY FORCE BY PEACE OFFICERS.
Subd. 2.Use of deadly force. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay;
No comments:
Post a Comment